Dr. Sonnenschein also believes that by increasing their lifetime exposure to estrogen, eating hormone-treated beef may increase girls' future risk of breast cancer.
Monday, October 27, 2008
Eating Non-Organic Beef: Hormone Connection
Dr. Sonnenschein also believes that by increasing their lifetime exposure to estrogen, eating hormone-treated beef may increase girls' future risk of breast cancer.
Sunday, October 26, 2008
Xylitol Epic Gum & Mints: NO Aspartame & Sugar-Free
As a frequent gum chewer, I'm thrilled that I don't have to give up my gum chewing days. Instead, I will replace my conventional aspartame filled junk with Epic Gum. This gum is kid friendly too.
http://www.epicdental.com/t-learn-about-xylitol.aspx
http://www.epicdental.com/t-improve-kids-hygiene-habits.aspx
http://www.epicdental.com
What are the dangers of aspartame?
http://www.sweetpoison.com/aspartame-information.html
Source:
http://safety.lovetoknow.com/Dangers_in_Aspartame
According to numerous reports, 75 percent or more of food reactions reported to the FDA are aspartame-related. Some reported reactions thought to be caused by aspartame include:
- Headache
- Vomiting
- Nausea
- Memory loss
- Fatigue
- Vision loss
Friday, October 24, 2008
U.S. .Senator Russell Feingold: T. Boone Pickens' Energy Independence Pledge
Write to your members of Congress by clicking on link now!
http://action.pickensplan.com/c.hdKGIKNqEoG/b.4478389/k.67AB/PickensPlan_Action_Center/siteapps/advocacy/ActionItem.aspx?c=hdKGIKNqEoG&b=4478389&aid=11235
The letter goes as follows:
Dear XXX,
Thank you for contacting me regarding renewable energy. I appreciate hearing from you on this important issue. In order to protect our environment, our economy, and our national security, we must encourage the increased use of renewable energy and increased energy efficiency.
In the Senate, I have strongly supported efforts to expand the use of renewable energy. On December 13, 2007, I voted for a comprehensive Senate energy bill (H.R. 6) which will help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by raising energy efficiency standards for lighting, appliances, and government buildings; increasing the renewable fuel standard from 8.5 billion gallons in 2008 to 36 billion gallons in 2022; and setting strong but reasonable Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards. On December 19, 2007, the President signed the bill into law.
During consideration of H.R. 6, I supported efforts to establish a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) requiring that 15 percent of the country's electricity come from renewable sources by 2020. Enactment of an RPS would promote energy diversity, stimulate significant job creation, and deliver substantial environmental benefits. Unfortunately, the Senate rejected a motion to include an RPS in the bill.
I have also consistently supported and voted for the extension of renewable energy tax credits. During debate on H.R. 6, I supported a proposal to repeal nearly $13 billion in tax breaks for oil and gas companies over ten years and use that money, among other things, to provide multiyear extensions of tax credits for wind and solar projects, as well as promote energy efficiency. I was disappointed the Senate narrowly rejected a motion to include this tax plan in the bill. I also voted to include clean energy tax incentives in H.R. 5140, the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008; unfortunately, the final version of H.R. 5140, which was signed into law on February 13, 2008, did not include the critical clean energy tax incentives.
On October 1, 2008, the Senate passed H.R. 1424, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, which included the renewable energy tax incentives I had previously voted for. The bill passed the House on October 3, 2008, and was signed into law by the President later that day. I am pleased that we succeeded in extending tax incentives for homeowners and industry to spur more efficient homes and appliances, renewable electricity, alternative vehicles, and renewable fuels.
You might also be interested to know that on September 11, 2008, I introduced the Energy and Technology Advancement (ETA) Act, which would help move new energy technologies from the research and development phase to the marketplace. In addition, my bill would encourage the USDA to pursue a biorefinery pilot plant that will allow businesses to partner with the federal government to test biofuel technologies, increasing the chance of commercialization. S. 3472 has been referred to the Senate Agriculture Committee. I look forward to Senate consideration of this legislation.
Thanks again for contacting me. Please feel free to do so in the future about this, or any other issue of concern to you.
Ada Cosmetics: Vegan Mineral Veil Foundation & Mineral Blush. Why Mineral Makeup?
Where can you purchase Ada Cosmetics?
Visit Natural Healthcare Store for your Ada Cosmetics products.
Ada Cosmetics is a signor of Campaign for Safe Cosmetics AND NIRC's "Truth in Labeling".
They have pledged to use natural ingredients and assures the use of NO chemical ingredients known or thought to have major negative effects including LINKS TO CANCER. They do not test on animals.
To learn more about Ada Cosmetics, visit them here:
http://www.adacosmetics.com/store/Cosmetics-p-1-c-251.html
Why Mineral Make-Up?
SOURCE: http://www.naturalhealthcarestore.com/makeupwhyada.htm
-
Purity! Mineral cosmetics are loose powders containing crushed minerals that have been extracted from the Earth's surface. Many dermatologists report that because high quality mineral cosmetics eliminate the use of classic "irritants" such as fragrances, binders, synthetics, dyes, and preservatives it is considered "purer" and can be kinder and gentler to the skin (see Dr. Endorsements). Additionally, it's not absorbed into the skin and won't clog pores, but actually adheres to the skin providing perfect coverage all day!
-
Natural SPF! Mineral make-up is formulated with a high concentration of the natural minerals titanium dioxide and zinc oxide, which are two ingredients commonly used in sunscreens. These minerals offer a natural sun protection effectively blocking both UVA and UVB rays. Ada Cosmetics offer protection of up to SPF20.
-
Water Resistant! Mineral make-up is water resistant and does not smear with perspiration making it the perfect choice active individuals. Great for athletes including swimmers, runners and bikers in addition to anyone who might get caught in the rain. Just pat dry with a towel!
-
Non-Comedogenic, Non-Acnegenic, Anti-inflammatory! Mineral make-up is so gentle it's recommended by many Doctors! Two of the main ingredients in mineral make-up, titanium dioxide and zinc oxide, are known for their natural anti-inflammatory properties (see Dr. Endorsements).
-
Better Prices! Ada Cosmetics provides it mineral cosmetics at the best price! As compared with the top brands you'll save 40% to 85%!
-
Better Ingredients! Ada Cosmetics prides itself on using only top quality ingredients! As such, Ada is a step above Bare Minerals and Sheer Cover as it excludes Bismuth Oxy-Chloride an ingredient known to irritate the skin causing itching, rashes, and cystic acne. See our comparison chart below!
-
Dr. Endorsements! As a result of its high quality ingredients Ada has received multiple Dr. Endorsements supporting the safe, effective and therapeutic effects of their make-up products.
-
Pure and Natural! Ada Cosmetics is a proud signer of both the NIRC's "Truth in Labeling" pledge and the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics Pledge. These pledges commit that Ada both uses natural ingredients and assures the use of no chemical ingredients known or thought to have major negative effects including links to cancer. Note that many major cosmetic companies have thus far refused to sign this pledge including Bare Minerals and Sheer Cover (as of 11/5/07). Review links to Campaign for Safe Cosmetics and NIRC.
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Presidential Election Tomato Spinach Egg Salad. Vote Early! McCain or Obama? Declare Yourself.
- Who are you voting for & why?
- Will you vote early or wait until November 4, 2008?
I cast my vote early this week!To celebrate I created (and ate) a
Presidential Election Tomato Spinach Egg Salad.
http://www.declareyourself.com/voting_faq/why_wait_.html
Know the issues:
http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=5856880291347077340
Know the candidates:
http://www.declareyourself.com/voting_faq/candidates.html
I Signed The Pickens Plan Petition--Will You?
asking the Presidential candidates to tell us
what their plan is for energy independence.
Sunday, October 19, 2008
Replacing Your Non-Stick Cookware with Safer Alternatives
What are the possible health effects? http://www.enviroblog.org/2008/04/cheatsheet-perfluorochemicals.htm
If you are looking to replace your non-stick cookware with safer alternatives,
check out the following list (see below) from the Green Guide.
Source: http://www.thegreenguide.com/doc/ask/nonstick
What to Look Out For
Since Teflon is only one variety of the non-stick chemical polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) used on cookware, watch out for “non-stick” labeling and ask if the coating is PTFE, even if it’s not Teflon. Calphalon, Scanpan and All Clad’s non-stick pans all use PTFE coatings.
Alternatives
When you do replace your pans, choose cast iron, stainless steel or enameled iron. Here are some popular brands:
KitchenAid Stainless Steel 10-piece cookware set, including 8" and 10" French skillets ($149; www.jcpenney.com)
Lodge unseasoned Original Finish 10.25" skillet, ($13.95) and Cast Iron Cooking for Dummies set ($89.95; www.lodgemfg.com; 423-837-7181)
Cuisinart 10" stainless steel skillet ($60) and 7-piece Chef's Classic stainless steel set ($260; www.cuisinart.com)
DeBuyer Lyonnaise Carbon Steel Frying Pans 11" ($44.95; www.broadwaypanhandler.com, 866-COOKWARE)
All-Clad 10" stainless-steel frypan with aluminum core ($84.95) or 5-piece set ($394; www.broadwaypanhandler.com; 866-COOKWARE)
Le Creuset enameled 9" skillet ($49.95; www.broadwaypanhandler.com; 866-COOKWARE)